Instilling Life
Being Still
Jasmine Shah Varma
There is a painting by Vincent Van Gogh called ‘The Chair’. It is a self-portrait. In it, of course, the chair is much more than furniture.
Objects are ordinary things. But when imbued with suggestive meaning by artists, they become extraordinary. Indeed, it is not unlikely that the very first artist, whoever and whenever, began to explore the universe and the human condition through stationary objects, filled with life by the force of art.
As a genre in art, though, the term ‘Still Life’ began to evolve around the mid-17th century. It is hardly used today. In earlier centuries, genres tended to be clearly demarcated, while today they tend to blend into one another. As a result, Still Life is only mentioned in a historical context and in academic courses these days.
The premise of this exhibition is to contend that Still Life is a potent force in contemporary art, and that its definition has evolved over the centuries. Instilling Life presents some of the ways in which inanimate objects are being used to bring contemporary art to life.
Still Life is actually less a genre and more a motif that runs through different art movements. The Dutch painters of 17th century, the Impressionists, the Cubists, the Pop Artists and Conceptual Artists have all used Still Life in their works. There were paintings that were no more than skillful imitations of luxurious, beautiful objects or exotic flowers in vases; there were those which combined technically sophisticated skills with allegory and symbolism; paintings that specialised in creating an illusion of reality; compositions with things such as snuffed out candle, time piece or skull that were reminders of frivolity of material desires and inevitable death; painting of factory-made identical objects like the Campbell soup cans; and revolutionary use of readymades by Marcel Duchamp’s ‘Fountain’.
Inanimate objects made an appearance in India art when Western academic training was introduced. Objects were not independently rendered in miniature painting, ancient Buddhist cave art, temple carvings or regional traditional art. Objects held in hands of deities held symbolic meaning, but were never the central subject. That changed around the middle of the last century. Still Life has been used by Indian artists since in a variety of contexts. But Instilling Life is not a historical tour. It is a series of snapshots of how some of our artists who have made inanimate object the central image in their work.
- an excerpt from the catalogue
Click on the images below to enlarge them

Manjal Pye (Yellow bag), 2007, Oil on canvas, 54 x 54 inches

Homage to a Grain of Rice, 2007, Oil on linen, 40 x 40 inches

Intensive Care, 2007, Oil on canvas, 54 x 54 inches
Nostalgia 2, 2006-2007, Acrylic on canvas, 24 x 24 inches each (2 panels)
sold
Nostalgia, 2006-2007, Acrylic on canvas, 24 x 24 inches each (2 panels)
(sold)

Still Life, 2007, Acrylic on canvas, 48 x 36 inches (sold)

Comfort Zone (set of 3) 2007, 12 x 12 inches, ceramic

The Surface, 2007, Drawing on paper, 31.5 x 23.5 inches (sold)

Untitled, 2007, drawing on paper and fluorescent light, 41 x 29.5 inches each (Sold)

Multi Vitamin Capsules, 2007, Acrylic on canvas, 76 x 40 inches
Sold

Such A Long Journey, 2006, beaten copper, 48 x 10 x 7

Emotional Landscape, 2007, beaten copper, 18 x 4 x 4 inches

Unclaimed Objects 2, 2006, Acrylic on canvas, 24 x 24 inches

Unclaimed Objects 3, 2006, Acrylic on canvas, 24 x 24 inches
M SashidharanA Rose Without A Name, 2007, 53 x 20 (flower) x 4 (stem) inches and 4 meter fabric
Beaten metal, rust, colour and fabric (Sold)

Study for A Rose Without A Name, 2007

Untitled, 2007, Oil on canvas, 1.5 x 1.5 each (4 panels) (sold)

Untitled, 2007, Acrylic on canvas and bag;
30 x 22 inches (canvas) + 18 x 13.5 inches (bag painted on both sides)
(sold)















